Is the living masjid team wahabi?

Some people ask if the living masjid (LM)/"United Ummah" (UU) team that has tried to take over Harrow Mosque are wahabis?

The fact is summarised as follows:
The LM and UU team consists of a number of individuals. Many of them are wahabi, some are HT (Hizb ur tahrir) and some are unknown or Sunni.

Ask the LM and UU team the following questions:

1) Why are your members associated with wahabi institutes, for example Abid Khan- A full and well known wahabi who is part of Qiblah Foundation, a purely wahabi organisation with Yusuf Chambers.

2) Why do you have wahabis like Adnan Rashid and Yusuf Chambers supporting the livingmasjid team, and the livingmasjid (also called "United Ummah") twitter keeps posting on their wall and retweeting their messages? Adnan Rashid is the opposite of "openness" and "masjid4all" that the livingmasjid group keeps promoting.
For example:

3) Before the elections, the livingmasjid campaigners were sending texts and videos arguing that Harrow Mosque is "peeri", "doing shirk", etc. On the livingmasjid twitter, they promoted the video accusing Harrow Mosque of "shirk" (the video has been taken down since I exposed them a few days ago). Why did they do that if they're not wahabi? Such acts are the trademarks of wahabism.

4) They also openly supported the unauthorised wahabi sisters circle that was occurring in Harrow Mosque. When the Harrow Mosque Sunni committee asked the wahabi sisters leader to show her credentials, identity, obtain permission to teach in the Mosque and go through the proper permissions, she became rude, refused to cooperate and didn't go through the proper procedures of teaching. The livingmasjid team took her side and presented lies to support her case, falsely accused the committee of trying to ban sisters. Why did they support a wahabi teaching?

5) All the wahabi Mosques in the Harrow area were openly supporting the livingmasjid group. Why would wahabis support livingmasjid if they're not furthering the wahabi agenda? 

6) Why did livingmasjid condemn doing Mawlid in Harrow Mosque and accuse the Mosque of using donation money (even though the donations were given specifically for Mawlid)?

This all shows that the livingmasjid group is full of wahabis, no matter how much they may try to lie about that fact (this group has been known to lie, as also witnessed by some of the defections from their side). Whilst some may not be wahabi in the livingmasjid group, it is clear that the group is wahabi and has a wahabi agenda.